Golden Tankard

piratelaw

Joined: 02/28/2016 Posts: 6881
Likes: 5898


What she is saying in her filing is that she is protected from liability ..


She is saying that because her statements were recitations of her legal filings which were based on sworn statements of others- not on her own assertions of fact it’s not actionable. It’s not that she doesn’t believe the statements to be true, it’s just that she can’t be held liable for defamation based on reciting sworn statements that were legally filed documents. It’s potentially a solid defense that, if accepted, would short circuit the suit against her with minimal time and cost instead of a years long and million dollar defense cost.

(In response to this post by SuperRegionalDreaming)

Posted: 03/26/2021 at 10:14PM



+4

Insert a Link

Enter the title of the link here:


Enter the full web address of the link here -- include the "http://" part:


Current Thread:
 
  
Any of you dupes still backing Sydney Powell and her Kraken? #YouPeople -- SuperRegionalDreaming 03/26/2021 5:39PM
  She bore false witness. She is a discredit to her profession. ** -- SuperRegionalDreaming 03/26/2021 10:18PM
  Well then most lawyers are a discredit ** -- Paleales 03/27/2021 08:59AM
  Goes in red. Comes out blue. -- ECU20012005 03/26/2021 5:52PM

Support BYB: Shop at Amazon!

vm307