Banter Message Board

EC GrapeApe

Joined: 01/01/2016 Posts: 3888
Likes: 4013


It’s just as logical as implying that 94% of the deaths have nothing to do


With covid.

In reality, all #’s have nuances..... but either side of an issue picks their favorite number for arguing purposes. In the real world, a great many deaths have occurred that at-a-minimum would have been delayed. Bear Hodges was older and may have had 1 or more of the other items listed on the comid list..... but he had more life in him than many of the young folks posting on this board. He likely had far fewer years left than many, but it’s intellectually dishonest to imply that his death doesn’t count because of X, Y, Z. Similarly, being a relatively small amount overweight technically gets you on the list.

Many have passed with that box checked that likely would have anyway..... but implying that % to be 94 is downright foolish IMO. Just as foolish as saying that every death with it is the same as dying of it......

(In response to this post by Michabk)

Posted: 04/06/2021 at 1:53PM



+2

Insert a Link

Enter the title of the link here:


Enter the full web address of the link here -- include the "http://" part:


Current Thread:
  5,572 * 6% COVID only = 334. Sad. ** -- VosFrost 04/06/2021 10:36AM
  Please stop with the misinformation -- NYPirate02 04/06/2021 1:19PM
  Love this 6% logic -- Michabk 04/06/2021 11:43AM
  With and of counted the same Dr Birx gleefully exclaimed ** -- KingMackPirate 04/06/2021 10:49AM
  Pseudomasochist! Its not worth it. ** -- turbopir8 04/06/2021 10:06AM
  Do you mean “sadomasochist”? ** -- Kyle1 04/06/2021 10:56AM
  No. "Pseudo." -- turbopir8 04/06/2021 3:48PM
  Down, yes, but that’s still a big number. ** -- Kyle1 04/06/2021 09:56AM

Support BYB: Shop at Amazon!

vm309