Banter Message Board

stevebon72

Joined: 09/20/2017 Posts: 1377
Likes: 1139


My guess is BC saw no value in the game. Saw risk in losing to no name ECU,


got no benefits for winning. So they used the covid contract clause to opt out of the game. Same as TAM not wanting to play no name Wake.

(In response to this post by Pirate Next Door)

Posted: 01/02/2022 at 3:36PM



+1

Insert a Link

Enter the title of the link here:


Enter the full web address of the link here -- include the "http://" part:


Current Thread:
 
  
Our friends at BC -- Buccan_A_Wright 01/02/2022 1:13PM
  If BC had allowed the game… -- Pirate Next Door 01/02/2022 2:13PM
  Yeah what sportsmen and a bunch of gutless wonders. ** -- Saber Rattler 01/02/2022 9:59PM
  BC very decent football history. Basketball not up -- Piratebctay 01/02/2022 5:16PM
  Was a bad move for them to go to acc ** -- Rolling OX 01/02/2022 9:12PM
  Disagree. With that thinking ECU would -- Piratebctay 01/02/2022 9:26PM
  ECU gets wins 7 and the Stans think they can flex on others? -- SuperRegionalDreaming 01/02/2022 5:25PM
  Does that give them a pass for pussing out? ** -- Bristol 32 01/02/2022 4:53PM
  Tell me again why the ACC added BC ** -- JollyRoger 01/02/2022 1:16PM
  Because that school dominates the Boston tv market, -- CutePirate 01/02/2022 6:28PM
  Maybe to lure ND… -- Pirate Next Door 01/02/2022 2:16PM
  Boston and New England media market. Not so much about BC -- gvegaspirate 01/02/2022 1:33PM
  The easy reply to that appears to me -- HighRockPirate 01/02/2022 1:30PM
  You have to wonder… -- Pirate Next Door 01/02/2022 2:06PM
  UTSA is a rising college town -- ecu91 01/02/2022 1:53PM

Notice: Trying to get property 'queue' of non-object in /data/www/sportswar.com/wp-includes/script-loader.php on line 2678

Warning: Invalid argument supplied for foreach() in /data/www/sportswar.com/wp-includes/script-loader.php on line 2678
vm307